Is Jesus a socialist?

Originally written for Shepherd of the Ridge Lutheran Church, apply these ideas to your local context.

Michael Moore, famous for movies like Fahrenheit 9/11, has made the claim in his upcoming film, Capitalism: A Love Story, that Jesus would consider capitalism sinful. The hypocrisy of Moore’s net worth (gained from capitalism) aside, it seems worthwhile to ask the question, “What form of government does God prefer?”

In a recent Bloomberg interview, Movie Critic Rick Warner asks, “Several clergymen in the film say capitalism is anti-Christian and that Jesus would have deplored such a dog- eat-dog system. Yet you hear from the right that capitalism and Christianity go hand in hand. Are they reading different Bibles?” to which Moore responds, “The number one thing in the Bible is redemption. The number two thing is how we treat the poor. All the great religions talk about this. The right wing hijacked Jesus 30 years ago. It was all a big ruse, but people fell for it. I don’t think people are falling for it so easily now.”

Moore got the first point right, absolutely. The focus of the entire Bible is redemption: God paying for the sin of the world by sending Jesus to the cross on our behalf. The entire Old Testament lays out God’s preparation for His coming, and the entire New Testament focuses on that singular event and its repercussions.

Is Moore right about how we treat the poor? Yes. “All the great religions” may be an exaggeration if you consider the Hindu caste system, but yes, Christians all should agree that we need to help the poor as much as possible.

But the question comes down not to “whether,” but to “how.” In the United States, the Democratic Party holds essentially that we can best help the poor by giving our taxes to the government, which can then redistribute the wealth where it’s needed. The Republican Party doesn’t generally trust the government to do this properly or efficiently and prefers to encourage people to give of their own free will according to their consciences as they see need.

Of course, both systems, because they’re designed by sinners, fall short of perfection. “Wasteful government spending” is a household expression, so kudos to the Republicans. On the other hand, every time I refer someone in need to a government aid organization, I think of the Democrats. Plenty of other smaller political parties have other ideas which would be best.

So what form of governmental economy would Jesus endorse? If we were to only look at the Bible for governmental advice, we see only monarchies, but even those don’t get God’s stamp of approval. (1 Samuel 8:7-21) In fact, when Chronicles evaluates the various kings, their economic policies never enter into the equations. Rather, their faithfulness to the Living God is the sole scale by which they’re judged.

The Bible, rather than endorsing a specific form of government, focuses on hearts, not legislation. God wants us to help the poor, but out of love, faith, and gratitude, not compulsion. (2 Corinthians 9:7) We can debate about how this can best be done, but God will stay out of that discussion until the last day when He raises the dead and gives us the riches of His Kingdom because of the poverty of Christ. Meanwhile, we rejoice that He has given us the riches of His undeserved love and the promise of eternal life as we live as citizens of both heaven and earth.




How to live forever

A section of DNA; the sequence of the plate-li...

Image via Wikipedia

Originally written for Shepherd of the Ridge Lutheran Church, apply these ideas to your local context.

As people live longer, we continue to strive for greater health advances and more longevity. Some futurists even suggest that a lifespan of 200 or more years may become the norm to those born within a few decades. In a recent episode of the Today Show (Sorry–I can’t find a link to the clip), a researcher suggested that the human DNA has no “death gene” and so, by eliminating disease and accidents, life expectancy can extend toward a thousand years. This lack of a “death gene” sounds a bit simplistic, but at the same time, it doesn’t surprise me.

God created human beings for immortality. Had Adam and Eve avoided the temptation to disobey God regarding the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 3), we would all live forever on this world. That our genetic structure seems to reflect this just confirms what we’ve known for thousands of years. It also shows the distinct possibility that our bodies after the final resurrection may well be very similar in composition to their current composition, except that it will lack the corruption that causes us to die–which is something called “sin,” a spiritual condition that modern microscopes can’t see.

But while we’d all certainly like to be healthier, and while we treasure life because it’s a gift from God, we need not incessantly pursue an escape from death. When Jesus died on the cross, He conquered death once and for all. He submitted Himself to death to turn it inside-out, and His resurrection proved that death cannot overcome the Lord of Life. Although Jesus raised Lazarus from death, Lazarus died again years later, but one day, He will raise Lazarus, you, and me to live forever, free from sin and free from death forever.




Christian Parenting: Passing on the Faith

Originally written for Shepherd of the Ridge Lutheran Church, apply these ideas to your local context.

Image by loswl via Flickr

As I write this, school is about to begin. Every store in town has pencils on sale, and they’re flying off the shelves almost as fast as employees stock them. We as citizens, parents, and members of our community put a lot of emphasis on education. We want good schools, and Cleveland’s recent poor school ratings upset a lot of people, but why do we place such importance on school quality? For many, the quality of a child’s education determines that child’s future, or at least places a significant impact on it. We know that and want the best for our children and for the future of our nation and the world, and we know that, the sharper we hone their minds, the more they’ll potentially accomplish throughout their lives. So why then do we place such little emphasis on spiritual education? Earthly education has undeniable importance, but spiritual education has eternal consequence. The Word of God is the only weapon that will fend off the devil’s attacks, but if we don’t train our children to use this weapon, they will be defenseless when the attacks come. To help parents, we offer the Divine Service, Sunday School, Confirmation Class, and other educational opportunities, but ultimately, the responsibility rests in parents’ hands. Assuming you want your child to remain in the faith until meeting Jesus on the Last Day, here are some simple parenting tips to help make that happen:

  • Model the Christian life: Show your children that living as a forgiven child of God impacts every aspect of life by doing what you can to help those God has placed in your life.
  • Show them Christ’s forgiveness: By His death, Jesus has forgiven all your sins. Show everyone that you believe in that forgiveness by forgiving others, because God has already forgiven them. When someone apologizes to you, instead of saying, “It’s OK” or something similar, say, “Your forgiven” (and mean it).
  • Remember the Sabbath Day: Too many people understand this to mean “go to church once a week,” and while that’s included in this command, it doesn’t stop there. God gives us His love every day, so return that love by hearing His life-giving message at every opportunity through personal devotions and Bible reading in addition to study with others that you may grow from their insights. Spend family time discussing God’s Word and how it applies to the situations in their lives. When you see good examples, point them out.

Remember that we live in a fallen world, so sometimes, even the perfect parents will see a child wander from the faith due to circumstances beyond their control, and other times, by God’s grace, the children of atheist parents become Christians, so none of these guarantee anything, but know that God loves your children, grandchildren, Godchildren, and all children and will continue to reach out to them through means beyond our expectations to keep them with Him forever, so rest assured that you are not alone in your efforts. God Himself is with you in your task.




Evangelism Moment: How to respond as a Christian to the homosexuality debate

Originally written for Shepherd of the Ridge Lutheran Church, apply these ideas to your local context.

As the ELCA discusses the role or acceptance of LGBT clergy at the 2009 Churchwide Assembly, it seems like a good opportunity to discuss how God uses the sin in the world, not condoning it, but twisting it back to His glory. God never ceases to amaze me as He takes the pain and suffering and evil in the world, evil with no intrinsic good, and brings good from it just as He brought the universe from nothing. Best example: the Son of God is murdered, and the world gains eternal life.

While I’m saddened by the widespread dismissal of the Word of God as He speaks to the issue of sexuality, God will use this through us, and here’s how:

When Christians talk about “gay marriage,” they usually refer either to Leviticus or Romans. While both of these texts address homosexuality, I’m convinced that the “proof text” for Christians is found in Ephesians 5, God’s definition of marriage, and I believe it’s there we need to start in our discussions with others.

God defines marriage with a simple formula: one man, one woman, married for life. The man’s role is to serve his wife, giving his life over to her needs, and the wife acknowledges his loving service and supports him in love, so they give themselves to each other in lifelong service and self-sacrifice, modeling our relationship with Christ and showing that mutual unconditional love to each other.

Our society long ago already eliminated “married for a lifetime” from the equation, so it shouldn’t surprise us when the rest of the equation gets corrupted. But that formula isn’t just God being a bully—He wants us to know His love, and He has given us marriage that we may have a taste of His love. When we change the equation, we either end up with a church with no Savior or two Christs and nobody saved or church and Christ divided from each other without His unconditional love. And even on a practical level, if we eliminate God’s equation, we open marriage up to other corruptions like polygamy and more.

So take this opportunity to discuss the issue—it’s a “water cooler” topic now! And remember these points:

† All sexual sin, including heterosexual intimacy outside marriage, is equally rebellion against God but also equally forgiven by Christ’s blood.

† Jesus died for all people, regardless what sin tempts them. Since they were worth that much to Him, who are we to not love them?

† While some may find satisfaction in a man-made corruption of God’s natural order, God wants so much more for us—He wants us to know His love and experience it through each other until the great wedding feast on the last day.

Our rebellion against God’s good and loving will for us put Jesus on the cross, but on that same cross, we find our loving Bridegroom. God give us the opportunity to share His love through this sinful action and wisdom to season our discussions with the Good News of His true love.




Evangelism Moment: Getting the Word Out

Originally written for Shepherd of the Ridge Lutheran Church, apply these ideas to your local context.

Since I’ve been here, I’ve heard a lot of comments that people hope my presence here will somehow bring people back who’ve somehow slipped through the cracks, especially the younger (under 40) generations whom statistically we see less of at any given service.

What won’t work

Having a younger pastor will not suddenly encourage most absent members to suddenly be present. Most of them don’t even know how old I am, and my generation, in many ways, is the “What’s your point?” generation. Why should they care whether I’m young? Is 37 even all that young? What does that mean to them?

Contemporary services are seen by many churches as a panacea for waning attendance and the need for evangelism, but very few people choose to attend or join a church based on its service style. Both traditional and contemporary styles have pros and cons, and usually, people care more about the people in a church than the service. Yes, I plan to experiment with our service format a bit, starting September 9 & 13, but this is more for the benefit of those already here than those outside. Making the service visitor-friendly is mostly about the format of our worship folder, which we’re busy tweaking each week, and we value your input.

What will help

In a town our size, we need to be friendly without smothering. When you see someone you don’t know, go talk to them. Introduce yourself. Ask about their families, especially kids and grandkids. And really listen. Let them know you care without being nosy. If they’re single, ask what they like to do for fun or where they’re from. If they look slightly familiar or you’re not sure whether they’re members or visitors, say, “Hi, I’m ___. I’m drawing a blank on your name–should I know it?”

This is such common sense, but think about how often you’ve invited a friend to church. Offer to take them out for brunch afterward (which will give you a chance to see whether they have questions or comments about the service), and offer to drive if possible.

Leave a review! Our church is listed at the Google Local directory. Go there, and leave a review. Mention how long you’ve been a member and why you attend here or what you like about our congregation. If your kids are in our preschool, leave a review of the preschool at the same place. As that entry gets more reviews, and as we build our website, we will show up higher in searches and be easier to find when people look for a church in the area.

What will work

Remember that our goal is not to increase our service attendance. Yes, that’s a great way to share God’s love and engage souls with God’s Word, but it’s a strategy, not our ultimate goal. Our ultimate goal is more souls saved from hell, and the way that happens is by loving each other, loving those outside the church, and especially loving those we have the most difficulty loving, as they tend to need it the most.

So the key to accomplishing that mission is loving people. But remember that love is more than just a warm feeling. It means doing what you can to help others: body, mind, and soul. It means making personal sacrifices for the well-being of others. It means stepping outside your comfort zone, changing plans, and making the cross and empty tomb the center of everything you do.

Because that’s what Jesus did for us.




Catechism/Confirmation Resources

The Small Catechism, 1991 edition

The Small Catechism, 1991 edition (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

59905-FIELDATTACHEDFILE: Constructing a Church Year Calendar. Beginning with Easter, the student is moved forward and backward, constructing the Church Year calendar in the same way that the church constructed its own. Explains placement of festivals and the colors assigned.

Comprehension Exercises: On these pages, you can find Dale Critchley‘s confirmation resources, which include Comprehension Exercises–worksheets that incorporate the 6 chief parts with Bible context, apologetics training, and mission training. They are a work under construction, but take a look. Also included there are skits and other resources.

Supplemental material for the According to Plan Bible Overview curriculum (From the Lutheran Church of Australia & published by CPH): Includes skits, quizzes, memory work schedule, & lesson plans (Updated Aug 28, 2001) Word 97/98

Secret Service Form (Idea adapted from Faith InkubatorsPDF

Christmas Story Exam (Borrowed from Rev. Keith Jones) PDF

Skits for the whole catechism

The Mustard House Project: a curriculum that uses teaching methods gleaned from Sesame Street. Or go directly to the Resources Page.

Confirmation Sans Hoops: A curriculum designed to help students learn to use Scriptures together or independently with an emphasis on spiritual growth. Note that I only finished 1/2 the catechism with this, but I’m using a variation on this system for 2018/2019 that includes the original and updates including the rest of the catechism.)


Other Sites

Catechesis: Basic Bible Knowledge for the Family: A graded curriculum that includes weekly catechetical bulletin inserts.

Concordia Catechetical Academy: Makers of Lutheran Catechesis and other resources

Scholia.net’s confirmation page




Christian Mobile Software

As mobile software becomes more a part of our lives, whether on smartphones, PDA’s, or other devices, these applications bring us into contact with each other more than ever before. I can keep up with my congregation through their Facebook pages and Twitter posts and know what’s happening with them as it happens. Through email, I can have lengthy, researched theological discussions. And in forums, I can discuss the Faith with total strangers all over the world.

But is there a need for a “Christian” mobile application, or does the current crop of more general purpose apps lend its use to specifically Christian needs, or even religiousneeds in general? Is there a need for a mobile “discipleship” application? I can already send prayer requests and responses through Twitter, Facebook, or the rest, but could new software do a better job? Let’s take a look at a handful of needs and consider some possibilities.

Personal Devotion

The most important aspect of a mobile discipleship application is, as I see it, keeping the mind on God throughout the day, keeping the focus and perspective that all we do comes under God’s Kingdom. One way to do this would be through some kind of daily devotion. While free daily devotions abound on websites, rss feeds, and email subscriptions, giving the Christian quick, easy access would be handy, not to mention encouraging personal “time with God” and spiritual growth. In a mobile app, I see no reason to reinvent the wheel. Simply offer a list of devotions that are available via RSS feed, and allow the user to choose 1. Also allow custom entry in case the user prefers a different feed. Daily Bible readings should accompany this as well, but are probably less prevalent. I’ve already compiled a “verse of the day” database but would recommend a “passage of the day” database instead.

Mobile Bible Reading

Speaking of Bible reading, a mobile Bible index would be handy as well. Olive Tree Software makes a great app for Palm, PocketPC, and other apps. While this feature could easily be separate from the rest of what I’m proposing here, several Bible apps already exist for iPhone/iPod Touch and most mobile platforms, often for free, plus a license fee for certain translations.

Prayer

Prayer needs in a mobile app fall into several categories: requests, suggestions, and instruction.

First, imagine being able to post a prayer request, either on this app or using a web form, and suddenly, hundreds or thousands of people are praying for you or your loved one. In your personal prayer time, do you wonder what to pray about or whom to pray for? This would offer a running list. Depending on popularity, the list of prayer requests could get long, so you could just look at the list while praying and for as long as you pray. Consequently, not every person will be praying for every request. While this could potentially lead to gossip, those posting requests would be encouraged to submit only a first name. (God knows who we’re praying for, even if we don’t.) It would also need some kind of moderation or filtering to prevent trolling and spamming.

Besides the live feed of personal requests, suggestions for prayer could also be included, such as prayer for the government, families, churches, the lost, and many more. Psalms would also work well, given that they are inspired prayers.

Finally, many don’t know how to begin or may feel insecure about approaching the Almighty. Some instruction may be helpful. I would suggest starting with the Lord’s Prayer, but other suggestions include a daily prayer thought, like, “God listens to our prayers, not because we deserve to be heard, but because Jesus earned the right for us.”

Theological discussion

Sites like fshbwl offer a great place for theological discussion in a daily life sense, bouncing ideas around and applying the rubber to the road. I know of no existing app except something like Twitter, but in order to have a decent discussion, you absolutely need more than 140 characters, so some kind of chat or forum functionality would be important to provide spiritual growth through iron sharpening iron. Again, spam filters would be necessary, and this would likely attract trolls at some point, but a proper community should be able to handle trolls.

Catechesis

Teaching the basics of the faith and expanding on them would not so much be a separate function, but a running theme throughout the application. I see this, though, as something that needs to be intentionally integrated wherever possible.

Worship

Here’s an area I’m wondering about. How could this application provide, enhance, or augment personal or corporate (presumably small-group) worship? Maybe it would provide liturgies for personal devotional times or small groups. Maybe music enters in here somewhere. Leave a comment below to offer suggestions.

What else am I missing? What wouldn’t be necessary? How do you envision such an app, or do you see it as unnecessary? Post a comment, and join in the discussion.




Legal, Safe, and Rare? Not likely

This past weekend, Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama both spoke to a crowd in Pennsylvania about faith issues. Besides the verbal sparring, which we can expect to continue, one cliché came out of Senator Clinton’s mouth that I’m tired of hearing: “Safe, legal, and rare.”

Of course, she was talking about abortion, but only one those three words can accurately describe abortion in the United States, and the other makes the combination an oxymoron.

The first, safe, is inherently an oxymoron. When asked whether life begins at conception, she showed her ignorance (giving her the benefit of the doubt) by saying, “I believe the potential for life begins at conception.” OK, how do we define “alive”? Well, I’ll give you a hint. When a stillbirth occurs, that fetus (Latin for “baby”) is dead. Something cannot be dead unless it was once alive. “Dead” does not mean, “Not alive.” Rather, it means, “No longer alive.” This is common sense. But to answer with science, the common traits of living things from the dictionary definition: the condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and dead organisms, being manifested by growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to environment through changes originating internally. The embryo does every one of these things. If blue-green algae, which doesn’t even have a cell nucleus, is alive, then certainly so is an unborn human child, who has a complete set of human chromosomes.

So abortion is, by definition, unsafe for the baby, as its goal is that child’s death. But neither is it safe for the mother. Abortion facilities are notorious for their dirty standards and even have lower cleanliness standards, by law, than a standard hospital. There’s nothing safe about that. Does making the facility legal make it safer? Given how many more women are subjecting themselves to them instead of abortion alternatives like adoption, no. The “coat hanger” argument makes a rule out of the exception, as self-inflicted-abortion was extremely rare before abortion was legalized.

This of course leads to the final word, “rare.” She says she wants to keep it “rare”. How does she define rare if she considers the status quo to be “rare”? Every day, about 3,300 babies are aborted. That’s more than 1 every 30 seconds, and yes, that’s just in the United States. Now if I tapped you on the shoulder once every 30 seconds 24/7/365, would you consider that “rare”? But of course, we’re not talking about tapping shoulders. We’re talking about ending human lives. And just so we’re clear on “rare,” the birth rate in the United States is about 4 million per year. The abortion rate is 1.2 million per year. That means that 23% of births are intentionally prevented in our country. How is that rare? And furthermore, what has any politician who speaks that mantra ever done to increase the safety standards of abortion facilities or to limit the number of abortions performed? I’m sure the legislation and voting records are out there, but I have seen very little actions to back up those words.

On Easter 2008, we mourned the 4,000th American soldier killed in Iraq over the past 5 years, but nearly that many babies, none of whom made the valiant decision to put their lives in danger to protect the ideals of this country, are killed daily.

Thank God that He made that same decision, that He gave up His life on the cross to pay for all those sins, as well as my own.




Podcast Blocked in China

CrossFeedNews.com has been blocked by the Great Firewall of China pretty much since its inception, yet until recently, our podcast feeds have been able to get through thanks to the redirection provided by FeedBurner.com and Podtrac.com, but while I wasn’t looking, they closed the hole. Now, without using a workaround, our listeners in China can no longer tune in to our incessant rambling.

Not only does this keep a wealth of information out, including most podcasts, this also keeps rss feeds from getting in, so even blogs are blocked for the most part. Not only does this keep out many ideas that would be critical of the Chinese government, it is one more evangelism avenue that the government has closed. Until early September or late August, even though Chinese people couldn’t attend a real Christian church without fear and secrecy, they now can no longer hear the Gospel as delivered by podcasts to their own homes.

The Chinese government has even gone so far as to block other podcast sites like podcastready.com, podshow.com, libsyn.com, and a host of others that allow podcasts to be played from the site, thus circumventing the system.

Yes, persecution still continues today, and there’s a reason that some countries are escaped from, while others are escaped to. Even though we don’t always agree with our governments’ decisions, if you can read this, thank God for your freedom.




Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: A Review in Perspective

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Last night, I was up until 2 A.M. finishing reading Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. I knew I wouldn’t be able to sleep until I got to the end of the book, so engaging was the tale, so if I were going to lie awake wondering how it ended, I might as well stay up and finish it.

***SPOILER ALERT***

If you haven’t finished the book, bookmark this and read it later. I’ll be discussing the end at length. If you haven’t read the books or only seen the movies, stop now and go read the books. They’re a great read.

I need to preface this by explaining how I was introduced to Harry Potter. Having young daughters who love to read, my wife and I knew they’d want to read this series, so we checked the first book out from the library. We’d heard the controversy surrounding the series, so we wanted to make an informed decision as to whether they would be appropriate for our girls to read. Once we’d both read the first book, our response was, “That was a well-written fairy tale.” By the time we’d read the third book, which was the last one published at the time, we were hooked by the intricate plot and fascinating characters.

“But what about the sorcery?” Yes, God forbids sorcery in the Bible–no question about it. That said, ask a Wiccan or ancient historian about Harry Potter, and most will tell you that the sorcery in Harry Potter is, as I believe Jim said in a previous episode of our podcast, like comparing Barney to a T-Rex. Yes, there’s a definite resemblance, but they’re not the same thing. In Harry Potter’s world, wizards are born with special abilities as much as the mutants in X-Men. Those who object to Harry Potter must also object to Gandalf, Cinderella’s fairy godmother, Mary Poppins, and Sleeping Beauty to be consistent.

The other major complaint I’ve heard about Harry Potter, especially this final book, is that he’s not a very good Christ figure. And while Ms. Rowling has intimated that the book reflects her Christian beliefs, at no time has she said that the book is an allegory. It’s the difference between Narnia and Middle Earth. While Tolkien‘s beliefs are reflected in his writings, Lewis actually wrote the Narnia Chronicles to answer the question, “What if there were a world of talking animals and satyrs, and God set out to redeem that world? How would He do it?” While not an allegory, the resemblance is unmistakable. Rowling’s series falls somewhere in the middle of the two, but it leans more in the direction of Tolkien on the allegory scale. That critics have questioned the effectiveness of Harry as a Christ figure is a hostile witness to the Christian content of the series.

So objections aside, what do we find in “The Boy Who Lived”? We find the running theme throughout the series that true power is not found when we look for it, but rather is given when we need it. We find that self-sacrifice to save others is not only the height of nobility, but that upon which we all depend–the sacrifice of the One called on to save us all. And finally, that evil cannot understand love, not the emotion of affection we often confuse with love, but love in the Biblical sense–self-sacrifice. In Harry Potter, we learn that love is truly love when consciously put into action for the loved one. (Would that more divorced couples understood this before they “fell out of love”.)

These same themes are the core elements of the Bible: God’s love put into action to save His people, whether from Egypt, the Philistines, or ultimately, from ourselves and our sin. He did so by willingly sacrificing His life because it was the only way. And finally, that salvation is not something we can seek to find, but rather, that God seeks us, finds us, and gives us saving faith.

Is Harry Potter about Jesus? No. It never claimed to be. But do parts of it remind me of His great love for me and willingness to pay for my life and soul. Yes, but that’s not why I read and enjoyed the series. It was fun and engaging, and except for a study of little Teddy’s biology and a bit more on the subsequent relationship between Draco and Harry, she seems to have neatly wrapped up the plotlines. Then again, the Pensieve served as an effective plot device to explain to us what Harry wouldn’t have otherwise known.   Two more movies to go, after which we look to fan fiction and hopefully “Expanded Universe” novels to get our fix. And of course, we can go back and reread them! Enjoy.

Comments welcome.